bias: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
be in quality of life 0.81
be bad for business 0.80
has quality plus 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be bad for growth 0.76
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hostility, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(distortion, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hostility, is bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality sin)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hostility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hostility, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(distortion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(distortion, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(prejudice, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(prejudice, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hostility, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hostility, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality sin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bias, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bias, has quality good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bias, has quality wrong)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bias, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bias, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality wrong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bias, is bad thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bias, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(bias, has quality wrong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bias, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hostility, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hostility, is bad thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prejudice, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality sin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(distortion, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bias, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)