bias: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be problem in source 0.85
be problem for society 0.85
is economic problem 0.83
be different from problems 0.82
be problem learning 0.80
is environmental problem 0.80
be in state 0.79
be problem learning about history 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(distortion, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(prejudice, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(distortion, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(distortion, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bias, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem learning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in source)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in source)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in source)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(bias, be problem learning)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem learning)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bias, be problem learning)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem learning about history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bias, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prejudice, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(distortion, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)