bicycle: has two tire

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, toy
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, machine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings segway
Weight: 0.40
, bike
Weight: 0.38
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.37
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.37
, police car
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has two tire 1.00
has 2 tire 0.92
be a part of 2 tire 0.89
get flat tire 0.86
work long hour without get tire 0.81
has two wheel 0.80
has two wheel and two pedal 0.79
be used to rotate tire 0.79
be used to inflate tire 0.78
has two weheels 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(machine, be used to rotate tire)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bicycle, has two tire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(machine, be used to rotate tire)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(machine, be used to rotate tire)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bike, get flat tire)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bike, has 2 tire)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, has two wheel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bike, be a part of 2 tire)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(machine, be used to rotate tire)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bike, get flat tire)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bike, get flat tire)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bike, be a part of 2 tire)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bike, be a part of 2 tire)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(motorcycle, has two wheel)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, has two wheel)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bike, has 2 tire)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bike, has 2 tire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bicycle, has two tire)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bicycle, has 2 tire)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has 2 tire)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(bicycle, has 2 tire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two weheels)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(bicycle, has two weheels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bicycle, has two wheel and two pedal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(bicycle, has two weheels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(bicycle, has two wheel and two pedal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two wheel and two pedal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bicycle, has 2 tire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bicycle, has two wheel and two pedal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bicycle, has two weheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bicycle, has two tire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(machine, be used to rotate tire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(motorcycle, has two wheel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bike, be a part of 2 tire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bike, has 2 tire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bike, get flat tire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bicycle, has two tire)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(machine, be used to rotate tire)