bicycle: have front brakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, toy
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, machine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bike
Weight: 0.38
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.37
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.37
, police car
Weight: 0.37
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have front brakes 1.00
have brakes 0.97
have two wheels 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bike, have front brakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bike, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(bike, have front brakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(bicycle, have front brakes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bicycle, have brakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bicycle, have brakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bicycle, have brakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bicycle, have two wheels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bicycle, have two wheels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, have brakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(bicycle, have two wheels)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, have two wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, have front brakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bicycle, have front brakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, have front brakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bike, have front brakes)