bicycle: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, toy
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, machine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bike
Weight: 0.38
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.37
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.37
, police car
Weight: 0.37
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be most efficient means of transport 0.75
be much more efficient running 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toy, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bicycle, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(toy, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(toy, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pickup truck, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bike, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(toy, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bike, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bike, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(motorcycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pickup truck, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pickup truck, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bicycle, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bicycle, be much more efficient running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bicycle, be much more efficient running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bicycle, be much more efficient running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be much more efficient running)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bicycle, be most efficient means of transport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bicycle, be most efficient means of transport)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(bicycle, be most efficient means of transport)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be most efficient means of transport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bicycle, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(toy, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(motorcycle, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bike, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pickup truck, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bicycle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(toy, is expensive)