big brother: cutting to fish tank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brother
Weight: 0.77
, thing
Weight: 0.67
, tv show
Weight: 0.66
, game show
Weight: 0.66
Siblings father
Weight: 0.40
, nephew
Weight: 0.38
, cousin
Weight: 0.38
, uncle
Weight: 0.38
, grandfather
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
cutting to fish tank 1.00
go to fish tank 0.92
show fish tank 0.90
showing fish tank 0.88
go to fish 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, go to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(brother, go to fish)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(brother, go to fish tank)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(brother, go to fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(brother, go to fish tank)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(brother, go to fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(brother, go to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(brother, go to fish)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(big brother, cutting to fish tank)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, showing fish tank)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(big brother, show fish tank)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(big brother, showing fish tank)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(big brother, showing fish tank)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(big brother, show fish tank)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(big brother, show fish tank)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(big brother, go to fish tank)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(big brother, go to fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(big brother, go to fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(big brother, go to fish)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(big brother, showing fish tank)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(big brother, show fish tank)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(big brother, go to fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(brother, go to fish tank)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(brother, go to fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brother, cutting to fish tank)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(brother, go to fish tank)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(big brother, cutting to fish tank)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(brother, go to fish)