bike: is rear wheel drive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, vehicle
Weight: 0.63
, game
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings scooter
Weight: 0.72
, inner tube
Weight: 0.59
, honda
Weight: 0.58
, chopper
Weight: 0.53
, suzuki
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rear wheel drive 1.00
is wheel drive 0.94
drive one wheel 0.93
have wheel 0.91
have wheels 0.81
have large wheels 0.80
have big wheels 0.79
have front brakes 0.79
have axle 0.78
have solid wheels 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scooter, have wheels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(scooter, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(scooter, have wheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bike, have wheel)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bike, have axle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bike, have axle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bike, have wheels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bike, have axle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bike, have wheel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bike, have axle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bike, have wheels)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bike, have wheel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bike, have front brakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bike, have front brakes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(bike, have wheels)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(bike, have front brakes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(bike, have front brakes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bike, have big wheels)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bike, have big wheels)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(bike, have big wheels)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bike, have wheel)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(bike, have big wheels)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bike, have wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bike, is rear wheel drive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bike, is rear wheel drive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(scooter, have wheels)