bill clinton: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents george bush
Weight: 0.72
, governor
Weight: 0.72
, democrat
Weight: 0.72
, clinton
Weight: 0.72
Siblings senator
Weight: 0.35
, jackson
Weight: 0.34
, congressman
Weight: 0.34
, nancy
Weight: 0.32
, detroit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad guy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(detroit, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(detroit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(detroit, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bill clinton, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bill clinton, is bad guy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bill clinton, is bad guy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bill clinton, is bad guy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bill clinton, is bad guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bill clinton, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bill clinton, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bill clinton, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(detroit, has quality bad)