billboard: be at city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents advertisement
Weight: 0.61
, magazine
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.60
, radio station
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.59
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.34
, statue
Weight: 0.33
, radio
Weight: 0.32
, fountain pen
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city 1.00
be at large city 0.88
be at every city 0.84
be at state park 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at state park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at large city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(statue, be at city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(statue, be at city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(statue, be at large city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(statue, be at large city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(statue, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(statue, be at state park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(billboard, be at city)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(billboard, be at every city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(billboard, be at every city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at every city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(billboard, be at every city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(billboard, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(statue, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(statue, be at large city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(billboard, be at city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(statue, be at state park)