bin: have panels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents folder
Weight: 0.55
, receptacle
Weight: 0.53
, container
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, trash can
Weight: 0.32
, garbage can
Weight: 0.32
, shoe box
Weight: 0.32
, jar
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have panels 1.00
have solar panels 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash can, have panels)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(trash can, have solar panels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(trash can, have panels)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(trash can, have panels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(trash can, have solar panels)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(trash can, have solar panels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(bin, have panels)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bin, have solar panels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bin, have solar panels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bin, have solar panels)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bin, have solar panels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bin, have panels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bin, have panels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(trash can, have panels)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bin, have panels)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(trash can, have solar panels)