bing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, search engine
Weight: 0.57
, name
Weight: 0.56
, competitor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ping pong
Weight: 0.34
, oh
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.33
, feng shui
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality shit 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(search engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bing, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(search engine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(search engine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(feng shui, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(search engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bing, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(feng shui, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(feng shui, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(oh, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ping pong, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(oh, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bing, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bing, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bing, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bing, has quality shit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bing, has quality shit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bing, has quality shit)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality shit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(feng shui, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(oh, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oh, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ping pong, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(bing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)