bing: is underused

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, search engine
Weight: 0.57
, name
Weight: 0.56
, competitor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ping pong
Weight: 0.34
, oh
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.33
, feng shui
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underused 1.00
is heavily underused 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(bing, is underused)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bing, is heavily underused)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bing, is heavily underused)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bing, is heavily underused)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bing, is heavily underused)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bing, is underused)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bing, is underused) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bing, is underused)