biodiversity: be good for ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for ecosystem 1.00
be important to ecosystem 0.96
important to ecosystem 0.96
help ecosystem 0.94
affect ecosystem 0.93
be related to ecosystem 0.93
create ecosystem 0.92
be important within ecosystem 0.92
make ecosystem stable 0.91
make ecosystem more stable 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, affect ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(resource, affect ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resource, affect ecosystem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, affect ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, make ecosystem more stable)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(biodiversity, make ecosystem more stable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, make ecosystem more stable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(biodiversity, make ecosystem more stable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(resource, affect ecosystem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(resource, affect ecosystem)