biodiversity: be high in rainforests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in rainforests 1.00
be high in tropical rainforests 0.95
be high in rainforest 0.94
be high in tropical rainforest 0.89
be highest in rainforest 0.87
be highest in tropical rainforest 0.87
be high in tropics 0.78
be rich in tropics 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be highest in rainforest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be highest in rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be highest in rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be highest in rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)