biodiversity: be is compromised by human ecology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be is compromised by human ecology 1.00
be favourable in human species 0.79
be important to human society 0.78
be necessary to human life 0.78
affect humans 0.77
be related to biosphere 0.77
be important to biosphere 0.76
be important to humans 0.76
be in nature important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carbon, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(carbon, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to humans)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(carbon, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be important to humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect humans)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important to humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(carbon, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(resource, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(desertification, affect humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to biosphere)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be important to humans)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(desertification, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(desertification, be important to humans)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(biodiversity, affect humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be in nature important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, affect humans)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to human society)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be in nature important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to human society)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(biodiversity, affect humans)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to human society)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be in nature important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to human society)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be in nature important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, affect humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(carbon, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(desertification, affect humans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(desertification, be important to humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecology, be important to humans)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to biosphere)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resource, be important to humans)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(carbon, be important to humans)