biodiversity: be low in taiga forest biome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in taiga forest biome 1.00
be important to biome 0.87
be favourable in species 0.78
differ from land biodiversity 0.78
be favourable in human species 0.77
vary across biosphere 0.77
be related to biosphere 0.77
be important to biosphere 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to biosphere)