biodiversity: be related to biosphere

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to biosphere 1.00
be important to biosphere 0.96
vary across biosphere 0.85
be favourable in human species 0.80
be is compromised by human ecology 0.77
be low in taiga forest biome 0.77
be important to communities of organisms 0.76
differ from land biodiversity 0.76
be important to biome 0.76
be favourable in species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be is compromised by human ecology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to biosphere)