biodiversity: differ from land biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from land biodiversity 1.00
vary across biosphere 0.79
is species diversity 0.78
be low in taiga forest biome 0.78
be important to biome 0.77
be favourable in species 0.77
be important to biosphere 0.77
be related to biosphere 0.76
be favourable in human species 0.76
be important for survival of species 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(coral reef, be important to biosphere)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be important to biosphere)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be related to biosphere)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biosphere)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to biome)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be low in taiga forest biome)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, differ from land biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(coral reef, be important to biosphere)