biodiversity: has quality good

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality better	0.94
has quality worth	0.85
be good for environment	0.80
is good thing	0.78
be bad for environment	0.77

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(biodiversity, has quality better)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality better)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, has quality better)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(biodiversity, has quality better)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be bad for environment)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(biodiversity, be bad for environment)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be bad for environment)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(biodiversity, has quality worth)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(biodiversity, be bad for environment)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality worth)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(biodiversity, has quality worth)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, has quality worth)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(biodiversity, is good thing)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing)

Parents	issue Weight: 0.59 , resource Weight: 0.58 , concept Weight: 0.57 , carbon Weight: 0.56 , topic Weight: 0.56
Siblings	ecology Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.34 , conservation Weight: 0.34 , carbon tetrachloride Weight: 0.33 , coral reef Weight: 0.33

biodiversity: has quality good

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings