biodiversity: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
be good for environment 0.78
be important to us 0.78
has quality good 0.78
is everyone concern 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be beneficial as whole 0.76
is is should everyones concern 0.76
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is hard)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(conservation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(conservation, is thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(conservation, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ecology, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ecology, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is everyone concern)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is everyone concern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is everyone concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is everyone concern)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(biodiversity, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is is should everyones concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(biodiversity, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(conservation, is thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ecology, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(biodiversity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)