biologist: study

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
study 1.00
need study 0.94
study world 0.92
study life 0.92
study evolution 0.86
study physics 0.83
study chemistry 0.83
use classification system study 0.79
use models in research 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ecologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ecologist, study)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biologist, study)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biologist, need study)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(biologist, need study)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study physics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biologist, need study)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study chemistry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(biologist, need study)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study evolution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biologist, study life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biologist, study evolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use models in research)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(biologist, study physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(biologist, study life)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(biologist, study chemistry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(biologist, study evolution)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(biologist, use classification system study)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(biologist, study world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(biologist, use classification system study)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(biologist, study physics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(biologist, study chemistry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biologist, use classification system study)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(biologist, study evolution)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biologist, study world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(biologist, study life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(biologist, study chemistry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(biologist, study world)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(biologist, study physics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(biologist, use models in research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(biologist, use models in research)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(biologist, use models in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ecologist, study)