biologist: use classification system study

Property	Similarity
use classification system study	1.00
use classification system	0.95
use classification	0.92
use classifications	0.83
need study	0.80
study	0.79
study world	0.78
study evolution	0.78
study life	0.76

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(biologist, use classification system)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(biologist, use classification)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(biologist, use classification system)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(biologist, use classification)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(biologist, use classifications)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(biologist, use classification)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(biologist, use classification system)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(biologist, use classifications)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(biologist, need study)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(biologist, use classifications)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification system)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(biologist, study)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(biologist, need study)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(biologist, study)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(biologist, study)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(biologist, study life)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(biologist, study world)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classifications)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(biologist, study evolution)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(biologist, need study)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(biologist, study evolution)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(biologist, study evolution)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(biologist, need study)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(biologist, study life)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(biologist, study evolution)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(biologist, study life)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(biologist, study world)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(biologist, study life)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(biologist, study world)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Typical(biologist, use classification system study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(biologist, study world)

Parents	scientist Weight: 0.71 , researcher Weight: 0.62 , specialist Weight: 0.55 , computer scientist Weight: 0.55
Siblings	naturalist Weight: 0.64 , stephen jay gould Weight: 0.58 , geologist Weight: 0.58 , ecologist Weight: 0.54 , botanist Weight: 0.53

biologist: use classification system study

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings