biology: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.37
, ecology
Weight: 0.36
, physics
Weight: 0.36
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
be considered life science 0.95
be called science 0.93
is science 0.93
is important science 0.91
is most important science 0.90
be related to science 0.90
be considered soft science 0.89
is science subject 0.87
be related to physical science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(science, be called science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be called science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be called science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be called science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be called science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(physics, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(physics, be related to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is important science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(biology, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered life science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, be considered life science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be called science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, be called science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(biology, is most important science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered soft science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science subject)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(biology, is science subject)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered life science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, be called science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(biology, be considered life science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(biology, be called science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(biology, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(biology, is science subject)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(biology, is science subject)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biology, be related to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(biology, be related to physical science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biology, be considered soft science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to physical science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(biology, is most important science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered soft science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, be considered soft science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(biology, is most important science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(biology, is most important science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(physics, be called science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(physics, be related to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(meteorology, is important science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(science, be called science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(biology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)