biology: be related to physical science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.37
, ecology
Weight: 0.36
, physics
Weight: 0.36
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to physical science 1.00
be related to science 0.95
is science 0.88
is important science 0.88
be relate to science 0.87
relate to science 0.87
be related to social sciences 0.87
be related to biology 0.86
be considered science 0.86
be related to sciences 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is important science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to biology)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(physics, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to physical science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to physical science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to physical science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to physical science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(physics, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(physics, be related to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(meteorology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(physics, be related to biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(physics, be related to biology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(meteorology, is important science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is important science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(biology, be related to physical science)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(biology, be relate to science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biology, be relate to science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, relate to science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to social sciences)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to biology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biology, be related to science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(biology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(biology, be relate to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(biology, be relate to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(biology, relate to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, relate to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(biology, be related to social sciences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(biology, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(biology, be related to social sciences)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(biology, be related to biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(biology, be related to biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to social sciences)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biology, be related to physical science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(meteorology, is science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(physics, be related to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(physics, be related to biology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(meteorology, is important science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(biology, be related to physical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)