birmingham: be called tragic city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings london
Weight: 0.62
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35
, liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called tragic city 1.00
be called city 0.79
was called city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(london, be called city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(london, be called city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(london, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called tragic city)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birmingham, was called city)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called city)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called tragic city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called tragic city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called tragic city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(london, be called city)