birmingham: was called city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings london
Weight: 0.62
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35
, liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called city 1.00
be called city 0.97
is city 0.91
be called second city 0.89
is second city 0.84
was called magic city 0.82
be called iron city 0.81
be called steel city 0.79
be called tragic city 0.78
be called country 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sheffield, be called steel city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is city)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sheffield, is city)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(london, be called city)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(london, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, was called city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(london, be called city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(london, be called city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(london, is city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(london, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(liverpool, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sheffield, is city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sheffield, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leeds, is city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leeds, is city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sheffield, be called steel city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sheffield, be called steel city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birmingham, was called city)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called city)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(birmingham, is city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called second city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is second city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called tragic city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called iron city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called steel city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called tragic city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called tragic city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called second city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birmingham, is city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called iron city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called iron city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called second city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called iron city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called steel city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(birmingham, was called magic city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(birmingham, is second city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called second city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called steel city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called steel city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is second city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(birmingham, is second city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called magic city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called tragic city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(liverpool, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(london, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(portsmouth, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(london, be called city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leeds, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sheffield, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sheffield, be called steel city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(birmingham, was called city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)