birmingham: was called magic city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings london
Weight: 0.62
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35
, liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called magic city 1.00
be called magic city 0.99
is magic city 0.97
was called city 0.82
be called city 0.80
is city 0.77
be called second city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called magic city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sheffield, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(london, be called city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(london, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(london, be called city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(london, be called city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(london, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(london, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(liverpool, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(portsmouth, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, is city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sheffield, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sheffield, is city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leeds, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leeds, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(birmingham, was called magic city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called magic city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is magic city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(birmingham, is city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called magic city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called magic city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called magic city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(birmingham, is magic city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, was called city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is magic city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(birmingham, is magic city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birmingham, was called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be called second city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(birmingham, be called second city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birmingham, is city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(birmingham, be called second city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be called second city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(birmingham, was called magic city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(liverpool, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(london, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(portsmouth, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(london, be called city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leeds, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sheffield, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(birmingham, was called magic city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)