bishop: wear funny hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents church
Weight: 0.66
, leader
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.61
, saint
Weight: 0.61
, officer
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metropolitan
Weight: 0.54
, patriarch
Weight: 0.54
, catholic priest
Weight: 0.37
, pope
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear funny hats 1.00
wear hats 0.94
wear pink hats 0.92
wear hats in church 0.89
wear kippahs 0.85
wear shirts 0.85
wear mitre 0.85
wear yamakas 0.85
wear purple shirts 0.85
wear pink 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pope, wear yamakas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pope, wear hats)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear hats)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, wear kippahs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pope, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pope, wear hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(catholic priest, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, wear hats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pope, wear yamakas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pope, wear yamakas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(catholic priest, wear kippahs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, wear kippahs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bishop, wear hats)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bishop, wear pink hats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bishop, wear hats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear hats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(bishop, wear pink hats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bishop, wear hats in church)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear pink hats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bishop, wear yamakas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bishop, wear yamakas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bishop, wear mitre)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bishop, wear purple shirts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear yamakas)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bishop, wear pink)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bishop, wear hats in church)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear hats in church)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear pink hats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear yamakas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bishop, wear mitre)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear mitre)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bishop, wear purple shirts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear purple shirts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bishop, wear pink)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bishop, wear pink)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear hats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear hats in church)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear kippahs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear pink)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear purple shirts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear mitre)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bishop, wear funny hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pope, wear yamakas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pope, wear hats)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(catholic priest, wear hats)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bishop, wear funny hats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catholic priest, wear kippahs)