bitch: be in thong damn wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, woman
Weight: 0.57
, name
Weight: 0.56
Siblings karma
Weight: 0.57
, tori
Weight: 0.39
, whore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in thong damn wrong 1.00
be in thong wrong 0.97
be in thong 0.91
dress like dudes 0.78
suckin dick 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bitch, be in thong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bitch, be in thong)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bitch, be in thong wrong)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bitch, suckin dick)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bitch, be in thong)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(bitch, be in thong wrong)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bitch, suckin dick)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bitch, be in thong wrong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(bitch, be in thong wrong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bitch, suckin dick)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bitch, suckin dick)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bitch, be in thong)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bitch, dress like dudes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bitch, dress like dudes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bitch, dress like dudes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bitch, dress like dudes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bitch, be in thong damn wrong)