black hills: be called hills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south dakota
Weight: 0.57
, mountain range
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
, land
Weight: 0.55
, conifer
Weight: 0.52
Siblings north dakota
Weight: 0.34
, hill
Weight: 0.33
, blue ridge mountains
Weight: 0.33
, magic mountain
Weight: 0.32
, alp
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called hills 1.00
be called black hills 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hill, be called black hills)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hill, be called hills)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(hill, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hill, be called hills)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hill, be called black hills)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hill, be called black hills)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(black hills, be called hills)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(black hills, be called black hills)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(black hills, be called black hills)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(black hills, be called black hills)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(black hills, be called black hills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(black hills, be called hills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(black hills, be called hills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hill, be called hills)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(black hills, be called hills)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hill, be called black hills)