blackberry: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.70
, smartphone
Weight: 0.68
, phone
Weight: 0.68
, fruit
Weight: 0.65
Siblings raspberry
Weight: 0.37
, blueberry
Weight: 0.36
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be great for business 0.95
be better for business 0.95
be in business 0.92
be used for business 0.91
be used in business 0.89
has quality good 0.80
be considered business phone 0.79
is business phone 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(phone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(phone, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(phone, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(phone, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(phone, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(phone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(blueberry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blueberry, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(blackberry, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(blackberry, be great for business)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(blackberry, be better for business)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(blackberry, be great for business)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(blackberry, be better for business)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(blackberry, be in business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(blackberry, be used for business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(blackberry, be in business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be better for business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be great for business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(blackberry, be used for business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(blackberry, be used in business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(blackberry, be used in business)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be in business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be used for business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be used in business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(blackberry, be considered business phone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(blackberry, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(blackberry, is business phone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(blackberry, be considered business phone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blackberry, is business phone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(blackberry, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(blackberry, is business phone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(blackberry, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be considered business phone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be better for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be great for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(blackberry, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(blackberry, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(blackberry, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be used for business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be used in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, is business phone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be considered business phone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blueberry, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(phone, has quality bad)