blackmail: is illegal again

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, action
Weight: 0.50
, crime
Weight: 0.49
, word
Weight: 0.49
, activity
Weight: 0.44
Siblings bribe
Weight: 0.33
, coercion
Weight: 0.32
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32
, cheating
Weight: 0.32
, retribution
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is illegal again 1.00
is illegal 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coercion, is illegal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bribe, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bribe, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(bribe, is illegal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(coercion, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(coercion, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(blackmail, is illegal again)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(blackmail, is illegal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(blackmail, is illegal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(blackmail, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal again)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blackmail, is illegal again)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bribe, is illegal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(blackmail, is illegal again) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(coercion, is illegal)