bladder: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents urinary tract
Weight: 0.60
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.60
, body part
Weight: 0.59
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.58
Siblings intestine
Weight: 0.35
, small intestine
Weight: 0.35
, stomach
Weight: 0.34
, colon
Weight: 0.34
, gland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality full 0.84
has quality worse 0.84
feel good 0.80
has quality function 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bladder, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intestine, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(colon, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(gland, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bladder, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(intestine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(intestine, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(colon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(colon, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(gland, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gland, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bladder, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bladder, has quality full)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bladder, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bladder, has quality full)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bladder, has quality full)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bladder, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bladder, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality full)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bladder, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bladder, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(colon, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(intestine, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gland, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bladder, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)