bleeding: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
, treatment
Weight: 0.62
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
Siblings blood clot
Weight: 0.36
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.35
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.34
, pulmonary embolism
Weight: 0.34
, peritonitis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
minimise bad thing 0.78
take bad 0.78
has quality services 0.77
hurt bad 0.77
has quality question 0.76
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(risk, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(risk, take bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(emergency, has quality services)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(risk, take bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(peritonitis, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(blood clot, hurt bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(risk, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(risk, minimise bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(risk, take bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(blood clot, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(peritonitis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(peritonitis, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(blood clot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blood clot, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(blood clot, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(blood clot, hurt bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bleeding, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bleeding, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bleeding, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bleeding, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bleeding, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(peritonitis, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(blood clot, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pulmonary embolism, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood clot, hurt bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, has quality worth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(risk, minimise bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(risk, take bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bleeding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)