blimp: be in rochester

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.57
, vehicle
Weight: 0.47
, sign
Weight: 0.39
, craft
Weight: 0.38
Siblings helicopter
Weight: 0.34
, paraglider
Weight: 0.32
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.32
, drone
Weight: 0.31
, landing gear
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rochester 1.00
is nj 0.77
be in cleveland 0.77
be in texas 0.76
be in berkeley 0.76
be cheaper in florida 0.75
be cheaper in texas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(blimp, be in rochester)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(blimp, be in rochester)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sign, be in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(blimp, be in rochester)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sign, be in texas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in texas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be cheaper in texas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sign, be in texas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sign, be in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(blimp, be in rochester)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(blimp, be in rochester)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(blimp, be in rochester)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(blimp, be in rochester)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in cleveland)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(blimp, be in cleveland)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(blimp, be in cleveland)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(blimp, be in cleveland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(blimp, be in rochester)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sign, be in texas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vehicle, be cheaper in texas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sign, be in texas)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vehicle, be cheaper in texas)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(blimp, be in rochester) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)