blind people: have kids

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.61
, everyone
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.59
, pedestrian
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.34
, deaf people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, different people
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have kids 1.00
have fun 0.78
go to school 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have kids)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(poor people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(poor people, have kids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(blind people, have kids)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(blind people, go to school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(blind people, go to school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(blind people, go to school)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have fun)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(blind people, go to school)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(blind people, have fun)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(blind people, have fun)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blind people, have fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have kids)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(blind people, have kids)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have kids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(poor people, have kids)