blind people: were treated in 1800s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.61
, everyone
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.59
, pedestrian
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.34
, deaf people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, different people
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in 1800s 1.00
were treated during hollocaust 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(poor people, were treated in 1800s)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(poor people, were treated in 1800s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(blind people, were treated in 1800s)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(blind people, were treated during hollocaust)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(blind people, were treated during hollocaust)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(blind people, were treated during hollocaust)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(blind people, were treated during hollocaust)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(blind people, were treated in 1800s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blind people, were treated in 1800s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(blind people, were treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poor people, were treated in 1800s)