blind: be for landing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, track
Weight: 0.53
, treatment
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.33
, color blindness
Weight: 0.31
, wheelchair
Weight: 0.31
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.31
, electronic device
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for landing 1.00
be for up landing 0.97
be for up takeoff 0.81
be for takeoff 0.81
need open on takeoff 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(blind, be for landing)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(blind, be for up landing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(blind, be for up landing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(blind, be for up landing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(blind, be for up takeoff)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(blind, be for takeoff)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blind, be for up landing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(blind, be for takeoff)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(blind, be for up takeoff)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(blind, be for takeoff)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blind, be for up takeoff)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(blind, need open on takeoff)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(blind, be for up takeoff)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(blind, be for takeoff)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(blind, need open on takeoff)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(blind, need open on takeoff)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(blind, need open on takeoff)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(blind, be for landing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blind, be for landing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(blind, be for landing)