blindness: affect communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.65
, symptom
Weight: 0.64
, miracle
Weight: 0.62
, handicap
Weight: 0.62
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.36
, glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, cataract
Weight: 0.35
, bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.35
, paralysis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect communication 1.00
be barrier to communication 0.81
affect life 0.76
affect people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(miracle, affect life)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blindness, affect communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(miracle, affect life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(miracle, affect life)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, affect people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(miracle, affect life)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(blindness, affect communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, affect people)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, affect people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(blindness, affect communication)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(blindness, be barrier to communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(blindness, be barrier to communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(blindness, be barrier to communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(blindness, affect people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(blindness, be barrier to communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(blindness, affect people)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(blindness, affect people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(blindness, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blindness, affect communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(miracle, affect life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, affect people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(blindness, affect communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(miracle, affect life)