blog: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.71
, website
Weight: 0.65
, web site
Weight: 0.62
, journal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings command post
Weight: 0.55
, ko
Weight: 0.43
, kos
Weight: 0.43
, guido
Weight: 0.40
, aar
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality worth 0.85
is great 0.81
has quality services 0.80
be good for business 0.80
has quality resource 0.79
be essential improving 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(journal, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality resource)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(journal, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(blog, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(blog, is great)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(blog, be good for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(blog, be essential improving)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(blog, is great)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(blog, be essential improving)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(blog, be essential improving)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(blog, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(blog, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(blog, be essential improving)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(journal, has quality resource)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(journal, has quality resource)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)