blue jay: has physical part beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.65
, dead bird
Weight: 0.59
, mouse
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blue bird
Weight: 0.68
, jay
Weight: 0.38
, red fox
Weight: 0.36
, great blue heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beaks 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(blue jay, has physical part beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(jay, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(blue jay, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(jay, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(blue jay, has physical part beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, has physical part beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(blue jay, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(jay, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(blue jay, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)