board: be at store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings council
Weight: 0.36
, executive
Weight: 0.34
, senate
Weight: 0.33
, chair
Weight: 0.32
, group
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at store 1.00
be find in store 0.91
be at game store 0.88
be at office supply store 0.85
be at furniture store 0.85
be at toy store 0.84
be at bookstore 0.78
be at lumber store 0.75
be at lumber supply store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chess board, be at game store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(board, be at store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chess board, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(board, be at store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chess board, be at toy store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chess board, be at game store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at toy store)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at game store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at office supply store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at furniture store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chair, be find in store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(chess board, be at game store)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(board, be at store)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chess board, be at toy store)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(board, be at store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(chair, be at store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chair, be at store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chair, be find in store)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chair, be find in store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chair, be at furniture store)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chair, be at furniture store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(chair, be at office supply store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chair, be at office supply store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(board, be at store)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(board, be at lumber store)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(board, be at lumber supply store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(board, be at lumber store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(board, be at lumber supply store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(board, be at lumber supply store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(board, be at lumber store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(board, be at lumber supply store)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(board, be at lumber store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(board, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chess board, be at game store)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chess board, be at toy store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chair, be at store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(chair, be find in store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chair, be at furniture store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chair, be at office supply store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chess board, be at game store)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(board, be at store)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chess board, be at toy store)