board: be used to bilding

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings council
Weight: 0.36
, executive
Weight: 0.34
, senate
Weight: 0.33
, chair
Weight: 0.32
, group
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to judgement 1.00
be used to bilding 1.00
be at use 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chess board, be at use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(board, be used to bilding)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chess board, be at use)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(council, be used to judgement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chess board, be at use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(board, be used to bilding)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(council, be used to judgement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(council, be used to judgement)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(board, be used to bilding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(board, be used to bilding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(board, be used to bilding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chess board, be at use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(council, be used to judgement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(board, be used to bilding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chess board, be at use)