board: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings panel
Weight: 0.64
, at
Weight: 0.53
, arb
Weight: 0.38
, council
Weight: 0.36
, commission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.79
has physical part grooves 0.77
has physical part face 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(council, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(panel, has physical part face)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(panel, has physical part face)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(panel, has physical part face)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(council, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(council, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(board, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(board, has physical part grooves)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(board, has physical part grooves)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(board, has physical part grooves)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(board, has physical part grooves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(board, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(board, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(panel, has physical part face)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(board, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(council, has physical part eyes)