board: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings panel
Weight: 0.64
, at
Weight: 0.53
, arb
Weight: 0.38
, council
Weight: 0.36
, commission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get cheaper 0.83
is cheap 0.79
beat expensive 0.77
cost money 0.77
is inefficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chess board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(appointment, cost money)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chess board, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(appointment, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chess board, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(appointment, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(arb, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panel, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(panel, is inefficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(panel, get cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(panel, beat expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(panel, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chess board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(board, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(appointment, cost money)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(board, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panel, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(arb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(arb, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(panel, get cheaper)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panel, get cheaper)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(panel, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(panel, is cheap)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(panel, beat expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(panel, beat expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(panel, is inefficient)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(panel, is inefficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(board, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(board, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(appointment, cost money)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chess board, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(panel, get cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(arb, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(panel, beat expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(panel, is inefficient)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(panel, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chess board, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(board, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(appointment, cost money)