board: is taxable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings panel
Weight: 0.64
, at
Weight: 0.53
, arb
Weight: 0.38
, council
Weight: 0.36
, commission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is taxable 1.00
is taxed 0.84
be taxed at 40 0.84
get taxed 0.83
be taxed at rate 0.83
is taxed more 0.82
is tax 0.82
is taxed high 0.82
get taxed more 0.81
is taxed higher 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(council, is tax)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(commission, get taxed more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed high)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed more)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(commission, is taxed higher)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed higher)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(commission, be taxed at rate)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(commission, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(commission, is taxed more)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed more)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(commission, is taxed high)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(commission, is taxed high)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(commission, be taxed at 40)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(commission, get taxed more)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed more)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(commission, get taxed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(commission, get taxed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(council, is tax)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(council, is tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(board, is taxable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(board, is taxable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed higher)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at rate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(council, is tax)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(commission, be taxed at 40)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(commission, get taxed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board, is taxable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(commission, is taxed high)