boating: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.73
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, adventure
Weight: 0.57
, pursuit
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fishing
Weight: 0.38
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.37
, canoeing
Weight: 0.37
, sailing
Weight: 0.36
, swimming
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be bad 0.86
has quality shit 0.79
has quality loss 0.79
be bad year 0.79
CAN good 0.78
is lousy 0.78
affect water quality 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(adventure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(boating, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(adventure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(adventure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be bad year)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(canoeing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(swimming, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sailing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(swimming, has quality loss)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(adventure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(boating, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sailing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sailing, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fishing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(swimming, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(swimming, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(canoeing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(canoeing, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(swimming, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(swimming, has quality loss)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fishing, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, be bad year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(boating, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(boating, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(adventure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sailing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(canoeing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(swimming, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fishing, be bad year)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(swimming, has quality loss)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(boating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(adventure, has quality good)