boiling water: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.59
, heat
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liquid water
Weight: 0.40
, shallow water
Weight: 0.37
, water pump
Weight: 0.37
, hot water
Weight: 0.37
, pure water
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(boiling water, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(pure water, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(boiling water, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(pure water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(pure water, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(boiling water, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(boiling water, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(boiling water, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pure water, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(boiling water, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)