bomb: be better than chemical weapon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projectile
Weight: 0.59
, weapon
Weight: 0.59
, emergency
Weight: 0.58
, vehicle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.58
, nuke
Weight: 0.51
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chemical weapon 1.00
differ from chemical weapons 0.86
be more hazardous than weapons 0.85
be more hazardous than conventional weapons 0.84
be much more destructive than explosives 0.81
be much more destructive than traditional explosives 0.80
be more destructive than atom bomb 0.79
be more powerful than atom bomb 0.79
differ from other weapons 0.78
differ from weapons 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(weapon, differ from other weapons)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(weapon, differ from weapons)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(weapon, differ from weapons)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(weapon, differ from other weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(weapon, differ from weapons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(weapon, differ from other weapons)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(weapon, differ from weapons)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(weapon, differ from weapons)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, be more powerful than atom bomb)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hydrogen bomb, be more destructive than atom bomb)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(weapon, differ from weapons)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than weapons)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(weapon, be more hazardous than conventional weapons)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(weapon, differ from other weapons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(bomb, be better than chemical weapon)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weapon, be much more destructive than traditional explosives)