bomb: be used to destruction

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projectile
Weight: 0.59
, weapon
Weight: 0.59
, emergency
Weight: 0.58
, vehicle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pipe bomb
Weight: 0.73
, hydrogen bomb
Weight: 0.58
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.37
, missile
Weight: 0.34
, nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to destruction 1.00
be need to prevent destruction and death 0.88
be destructive 0.76
be used to destroy person life 0.76
be used to destroy property 0.76
destroy city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(weapon, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(weapon, be destructive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be destructive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, destroy city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(weapon, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, destroy city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, destroy city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bomb, be used to destruction)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bomb, be used to destroy person life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(bomb, be used to destroy property)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bomb, be used to destroy person life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destroy property)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bomb, be used to destroy property)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destroy person life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destroy property)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destroy person life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(weapon, be used to destruction)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(weapon, be destructive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, destroy city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(weapon, be used to destruction)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bomb, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(weapon, be destructive)